Open Marcus98T opened 10 months ago
Just curious, as you mentioned you had already noticed that the glyph difference is actually pointing to a more generic issue in #410. Is it necessary to open separate issues for individual glyphs then?
Honestly, I think Adobe will only fix small issues (especially those that are technical issues or simple outline bugs) and link those fixes directly to the respective GitHub issues in their changelog when the next minor version is released. But bigger issues like the "generic" ones I referenced will take quite a lot of time to resolve, and it's not a priority for Adobe to fix them at the moment, so I do not know what's the best practice to report such larger-scope issues to Adobe at the moment, other than to open small issues separately when I find individual glyph problems and reference them to an existing larger issue as well.
Referencing #410 and #425, the JP-designed uni6756-JP90-JP variant glyph looks better, especially the left 木 radical design as annotated in this picture. I believe the unreleased uni6756-JP glyph is identical to said variant glyph. So I think the CN glyph should be replaced with the JP glyph, or at least use the shape of the JP variant glyph.