Closed dr-scsi closed 2 years ago
With “font tags” I assume you mean the style name, such as Bold Italic? The typeface family is split up into various sub-families, such Source Serif 4 Caption, Source Serif 4 Text (name omitted), Source Serif 4 Display, etc. Can your parsing workflow take this into account?
With tags, I meant the key value pairs like Weight=semibold
. I think I will drop the author of autoinst
a line if he can also have a look at this issue. After your comment, I ran otfinfo -a SourceSerif4SmText-Regular.otf
to get the family name and the program returns Source Serif 4 SmText
. So maybe the problem is somewhere else. I will report back. Thanks.
I contacted the author of autoinst
and it seems this issue is related to it and not to the fonts. I close this issue. Many thanks for your efforts.
Thanks for the note – no problem :-)
Hi all,
first of all, many thanks for developing and providing these fonts. I downloaded the latest release
source-serif-4.004.zip
and ranautoinst
tool on the OTF-fonts. In case you're not familiar with this tool, it produces all the files you need to use OTF-fonts with traditional TeX engines like pdfTeX.The program doesn't succeed with this message:
The fonts are not unambiguous based on the fonts tags (I'm not sure if tag it the correct word in this case). It there a chance to update the files in order to make them unique based on provided information per font?