Open idea-list opened 1 week ago
Thank you for your comment – it’s always valuable to get feedback from native speakers :-)
I appreciate the comparison with other designs; and I can see how Source Serif’s ґ
may appear a bit narrow.
I have a question though – in some designs (Georgia, Noto, also Lora to some extent) the occurrence of ґ
introduces a lot of whitespace – which visually rips the word apart. Is this something readers are just used to? I guess the little tail in TNR and Brygada aims at counteracting that.
Based on your compelling feedback, I will make the Source Serif Italic ґ
a little wider – will keep you posted when a new release is ready.
I have a question though – in some designs (Georgia, Noto, also Lora to some extent) the occurrence of
ґ
introduces a lot of whitespace – which visually rips the word apart. Is this something readers are just used to?
It's a bit nuanced but the short answer is yes, I'd say the readers are just used to that.
Long answer: so we have two letters that are very similar in regular print text: г
and ґ
. The former one is extremely common in all kinds of words. The latter one is possibly the most rarely used letter of the Ukrainian alphabet and appears in a few commonly used words + in some archaic and dialect words + in some loan words to represent the sound [ɡ]
(which is not very common in modern Ukrainian).
So even though ґ
itself is not that common, the readers are still very well used to seeing г
in print non-italic texts in any position inside of the word (e.g. граматика, агрегат, миготіння, пиріг). I assume those words also have a similar 'issue' with whitespace inside of the word.
Now the handwritten forms of г
and ґ
significantly differ from the print versions. You got the italic version of г
right! But the twist is that unlike print letters, handwritten ґ
is not a minor modification of handwritten ґ
, it's a different shape.
I've grabbed examples from a copybook (kids handwriting practice book?). The top ones are Гг
and the bottom ones are Ґґ
:
However even though the handwritten lower case ґ
also has a large whitespace underneath its top arc in the above screenshot, in practice that isn't an issue because one is supposed to connect next letter to the bottom of the ґ
. So the connecting line goes across that white when writing.
Here I've typed a few different Ukrainian words with ґ
in different position between various letters using a font for those practice books (top row):
Word list (also агроґрунтознавство
features both г
and ґ
for comparison):
Зиґмунд Зиґфрід Аґрус аґрус Зґвалтування зґвалтування ґелґотіння ґирлиґа ґніт ґудзик агроґрунтознавство зиґзаґ кружґанок леґінь обґрунтування підґрунтя уґрунтовування фіґляр
I understand that italic font doesn't have to exactly follow the handwritten shapes. I'd say that most of the above fonts use a somewhat stylized slanted version of regular print ґ
in their italics. And in my opinion they do look good (or I'm too used to the way they look).
I like the look of Georgia and PT Serif. Lora's variant is also nice and interesting because it adds a two-sided serif at the bottom (that one wouldn't use in handwriting).
I agree that the rightward tail in TNR and Brygada likely aimed to compensate the whitespace gap. But as maybe you can see now the thing that makes those seem a bit odd to me is that the handwritten forms have a very different (acute, not circular) angle between the 'leg' of ґ
and the line that connects the next letter to it on the right side. Meanwhile the letter ґ
itself has a similar circular-ish tail pointing left which makes TNR and Brygada variants look somewhat twisted (at least for me).
I was genuinely positively surprised that your current italic ґ
has a leftward curl like the handwritten form (and like no other italic serif) so maybe there's a third way to compensate for the whitespace with a handwritten-like arched (not straight) top part too? I don't know, the rough version I did in the initial post doesn't look balanced at all but maybe you can come up with something.
Just to clarify, I don't insist on the handwritten form at all. I don't know what works or doesn't. This wall of text is purely for context to hopefully give you multiple ideas to choose from. And even though I prefer Georgia's variant over TNR's I don't think it's that big of a deal, so feel free to go with TNR's curl if you really want to do something with the whitespace.
TLDR: yes, I think we are just used to that.
Thanks again! Very useful indeed :-)
I really love this font but there's one glyph that bothers me: italic lower case Ukrainian ґ (ghe with upturn, U+0491). For me (I'm Ukrainian) the chosen shape looks very unusual: it is too narrow (see the last image).
Could you please consider changing this glyph?
In my opinion,
ґ
must have a significant top bar/arc (even the italic one). Currently it almost looks like a vertical-ish stroke with an attached "accent" (like a weirdi
or a very tiny integral sign). Sorry, I don't know the font terminology.For reference, here's how we are taught to write
ґ
:I've never edited the fonts before but I tried to create a quick and dirty mock-up to show the rough shape I want the letter to have: I just moved the "upturn" 80-ish units rightwards
Also here are a few examples of italic fonts from Google Fonts that generally have the shape I expect: Minor nitpick: I don't quite like the bottom rightward curl that Times New Roman's and Brygada 1918's
ґ
have, but that's not a big deal. I do like the bottom leftward curl that yourґ
has — it seems very logical when compared with the handwrittenґ
.