Repro: drag out 3 rects, select one, turn visibility off, then delete, then undo. Result: layer is returned but with visibility on.
This is a spin-off of #1942. The following are comments distilled from that issue...
With the "three rect" repro scenario mentioned above, there is indeed a difference between PS and DS. But interestingly, it has to do (it seems) with where the layer creation/deletion takes place, not the undo. In other words, if I set up the scenario in one system, then regardless of which one I use to "step back", the behavior is consistent between the two. Specifically, if I create, hide, and delete the layers in DS, then when I switch to PS and step back, then the layer becomes restored and visible.
Something about the way we are deleting layers is causing the 'step back' to make-visible the undeleted layer. As I mentioned above, it is possible to repro this 'step back' behavior in Classic PS if you do so on a layer that was deleted in DS.
mcilroyc
commented
8 years ago
Repro: drag out 3 rects, select one, turn visibility off, then delete, then undo. Result: layer is returned but with visibility on.
This is a spin-off of #1942. The following are comments distilled from that issue...
With the "three rect" repro scenario mentioned above, there is indeed a difference between PS and DS. But interestingly, it has to do (it seems) with where the layer creation/deletion takes place, not the undo. In other words, if I set up the scenario in one system, then regardless of which one I use to "step back", the behavior is consistent between the two. Specifically, if I create, hide, and delete the layers in DS, then when I switch to PS and step back, then the layer becomes restored and visible.
Something about the way we are deleting layers is causing the 'step back' to make-visible the undeleted layer. As I mentioned above, it is possible to repro this 'step back' behavior in Classic PS if you do so on a layer that was deleted in DS.