Since I cannot specify those dashed glyph names with the -g option (#1698), I am resorting to GIDs.
According to otfstemhist -h, -g is the option for this. koKai-thai is at GID 52, so I do
otfstemhist -g 52,53,54 my_font.ufo
WARNING: glyph ID <52> from glyph selection list option is not in font. <xxx Traditional-Regular>.
WARNING: glyph ID <53> from glyph selection list option is not in font. <xxx Traditional-Regular>.
WARNING: glyph ID <54> from glyph selection list option is not in font. <xxx Traditional-Regular>.
ERROR: Selected glyph list is empty for font <xxx Traditional-Regular>.
even when trying otfstemhist -g 0,1,2 my_font.ufo, I get the same output.
I think getting glyphs via GID from a UFO might have never been implemented – it also does not work for psstemhist.
I have a Thai font for which I’d like to analyze stem information. The Thai glyph names look like this:
etc.
Since I cannot specify those dashed glyph names with the -g option (#1698), I am resorting to GIDs. According to
otfstemhist -h
, -g is the option for this. koKai-thai is at GID 52, so I dootfstemhist -g 52,53,54 my_font.ufo
even when trying
otfstemhist -g 0,1,2 my_font.ufo
, I get the same output.I think getting glyphs via GID from a UFO might have never been implemented – it also does not work for
psstemhist
.