codecov[bot]
commented
2 weeks ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 77.84%. Comparing base (
d5b9b82) to head (559ef82). Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## dev #335 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 77.84% 77.84% Complexity 72 72 ========================================= Files 4 4 Lines 167 167 Branches 31 31 ========================================= Hits 130 130 Misses 20 20 Partials 17 17 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-cif-guides-venia/pull/335/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-cif-guides-venia/pull/335/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `77.84% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Description
Related Issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: