SITES-22111 - Extend core CIF graphQL resolver with new function/API to expose Errors

LSantha commented 2 months ago

added support for errors in more retrievers and components

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

[ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

[ ] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
[ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
[ ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
[ ] All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
[ ] I ran all tests locally and they pass.

bradea-adobe commented 2 months ago

@alwinjoseph02 @asilaghi pls see

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.11%. Comparing base (a4953d4) to head (0ab0ded).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...l/models/v1/productcarousel/ProductsRetriever.java	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1008 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 89.11% 89.11% Complexity 2226 2226 ========================================= Files 355 355 Lines 10039 10042 +3 Branches 1447 1447 ========================================= + Hits 8946 8949 +3 Misses 790 790 Partials 303 303 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-core-cif-components/pull/1008/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-core-cif-components/pull/1008/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `51.82% <40.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | | [jest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-core-cif-components/pull/1008/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `86.68% <ø> (ø)` | | | [karma](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-core-cif-components/pull/1008/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `95.54% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/aem-core-cif-components/pull/1008/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `87.37% <80.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

adobe / aem-core-cif-components