Closed buuhuu closed 2 years ago
Merging #927 (e5fbc2b) into master (e497022) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #927 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 89.73% 89.74% +0.01%
- Complexity 2018 2020 +2
============================================
Files 338 338
Lines 9261 9265 +4
Branches 1318 1319 +1
============================================
+ Hits 8310 8315 +5
+ Misses 678 677 -1
Partials 273 273
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
integration | 52.83% <60.00%> (-0.01%) |
:arrow_down: |
jest | 86.38% <ø> (ø) |
|
karma | 95.68% <ø> (ø) |
|
unittests | 88.86% <100.00%> (+0.02%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...rch/internal/services/SearchFilterServiceImpl.java | 88.52% <100.00%> (+0.80%) |
:arrow_up: |
...ents/internal/client/MagentoGraphqlClientImpl.java | 96.75% <0.00%> (+0.64%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e497022...e5fbc2b. Read the comment docs.
@Buuhuu - I have verified this change in my commerce setup which is running very long customAttributeMetadata query. I don't see any 414 errors in the log after I deployed this change and enabled the enforcePost checkbox in the config. This is good to go.
Description
With catalogs that have a lot of custom product attributes the customAttributeMetadata query executed by the
SearchFilterServiceImpl
for Product Lists and Search Results may exceed the query parameter limit of http GET requests. Using POSTs for the GraphqlClient in question will resolve the issue but is not recommended as it by-passes any CDN caching that may be involved.With this change we allow the CIF Search Filter Service to be configured to enforce POST only for the customAttributeMetadata query. The option is per default disabled. If enabled we recommend to cache the response by configuring the GraphqlClient caching accordingly.
Related Issue
CIF-2919
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Unit tests
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: