Open arunattri26 opened 1 month ago
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 93 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 82.35%. Comparing base (
fc813fc
) to head (0542b76
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Can you also add a test case for this use-case in this PR via visual rule editor ?
I will add it after it is merged. Since rule-editor would expect it to be present else the rule will fail. So we can't release rule-editor without this function being present in core-components.
Can you also add a test case for this use-case in this PR via visual rule editor ?
I will add it after it is merged. Since rule-editor would expect it to be present else the rule will fail. So we can't release rule-editor without this function being present in core-components.
The rule editor shouldn't rely on the core component version, as it may also fail with older versions. Please include test cases in this PR and allow them to fail until the new version of the rule editor SPA is released.
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 93 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 93 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Can you also add a test case for this use-case in this PR via visual rule editor ?
I will add it after it is merged. Since rule-editor would expect it to be present else the rule will fail. So we can't release rule-editor without this function being present in core-components.
The rule editor shouldn't rely on the core component version, as it may also fail with older versions. Please include test cases in this PR and allow them to fail until the new version of the rule editor SPA is released.
Done. I have added the tests for latest-addon and only my authoring test is failing.
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 94 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 92 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 94 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
page-has-heading-one | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
@arunattri26 One of the test case is failing, please check and fix it
@arunattri26 One of the test case is failing, please check and fix it
@rismehta , I checked it is failing due to old quickstart we are using in tests which does not have the latest exp-editor. After updating the QS with latest devrelease/sites-rotary branch it will get resolved.
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 86 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
focus-order-semantics | minor |
label-title-only | serious |
landmark-one-main | moderate |
region | moderate |
target-size | serious |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 100 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Performance | Accessibility | Best-Practices | SEO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 93 | 96 | 96 | 75 |
Id | Impact |
---|---|
label-title-only | serious |
target-size | serious |
Description
Related Issue
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: