ACNA-1833 | Externalising github workflows

[amulyakashyap09]

Description

Implement reusable github workflows

Related Issue

ACNA-1833

Motivation and Context

• Code Reusability
• Avoiding Redundancy

How Has This Been Tested?

• This will be tested after PR is merged and deployed.
• This is workflow changes can only be tested post merge.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [x] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• [x] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
• [x] My code follows the code style of this project.
• [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
• [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [x] All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (3ba4dc5) 100.00% compared to head (5bb32aa) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #211 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 19 19 Lines 546 546 Branches 82 82 ========================================= Hits 546 546 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[shazron]

lgtm, but some test results are pending

actually, no. It's the branch settings for required checks, which reference the old workflows. The new tests (build/build/...) pass fine. @amulyakashyap09 needs to update those, but it's a chicken and egg thing...

[shazron]

@amulyakashyap09 Needs required checks change in Branch protection settings.