#117 - Fixed issue with property predicate breaking initial state due…

… cyclic dependency on group id generation

Description

Predicate Group ID creation called isReady() which called getItems() which ended up using the wrong groupID since that predicate's groupID hadnt been properly created it.

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

[X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

[X] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
[X] My code follows the code style of this project.
[X] My change requires a change to the documentation.
[X] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
[X] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
[] I have added tests to cover my changes.
[X] All new and existing tests passed.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 27.79%. Comparing base (101d373) to head (66a0e4c). Report is 22 commits behind head on develop.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ponents/predicates/impl/PropertyPredicateImpl.java	0.00%	11 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #1118 +/- ## ============================================= + Coverage 27.59% 27.79% +0.20% - Complexity 535 538 +3 ============================================= Files 179 180 +1 Lines 4657 4684 +27 Branches 658 662 +4 ============================================= + Hits 1285 1302 +17 - Misses 3189 3196 +7 - Partials 183 186 +3 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/asset-share-commons/pull/1118/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/adobe/asset-share-commons/pull/1118/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe) | `27.79% <0.00%> (+0.20%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=adobe#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

adobe / asset-share-commons