Closed bosschaert closed 2 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 96.00000%
with 1 line
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 80.03%. Comparing base (
48867b1
) to head (5c6170d
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/storage/object/copy.js | 96.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Note that the total coverage actually went up as a source file (copy.js) that had previously 0% coverage is now partly covered. However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.
However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.
You can (and maybe we should?) change this setting so it reports even on untouched files. It will tank the overall score, but it would be much more accurate.
However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.
You can (and maybe we should?) change this setting so it reports even on untouched files. It will tank the overall score, but it would be much more accurate.
Great idea! Created https://github.com/adobe/da-admin/pull/58
Description
When a resource is copied it should get a fresh version history.
The rename operation also uses the copy operation internally, in that case existing metadata is reused as before to preserve version history.
Related Issue
Fixes #56
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Checklist: