Add new metadata for pure copies to get them a new version history

[bosschaert]

Description

When a resource is copied it should get a fresh version history.

The rename operation also uses the copy operation internally, in that case existing metadata is reused as before to preserve version history.

Related Issue

Fixes #56

How Has This Been Tested?

• Tested locally with da-live and da-collab
• Unit tests for the changed code
• Playwright tests will be added soon too

Types of changes

• [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

• [X] I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
• [X] My code follows the code style of this project.
• [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
• [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [X] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• [X] I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [X] All new and existing tests passed.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.03%. Comparing base (48867b1) to head (5c6170d).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/storage/object/copy.js	96.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #57 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 82.72% 80.03% -2.69% ========================================== Files 14 15 +1 Lines 909 1002 +93 ========================================== + Hits 752 802 +50 - Misses 157 200 +43 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bosschaert]

Note that the total coverage actually went up as a source file (copy.js) that had previously 0% coverage is now partly covered. However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.

[bstopp]

However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.

You can (and maybe we should?) change this setting so it reports even on untouched files. It will tank the overall score, but it would be much more accurate.

[bosschaert]

However codecov doesn't include files that aren't touched at all so it doesn't reflect this.

You can (and maybe we should?) change this setting so it reports even on untouched files. It will tank the overall score, but it would be much more accurate.

Great idea! Created https://github.com/adobe/da-admin/pull/58