Not sure how we can infer these more complex layouts with only divs. Here's my stab at this:
Row with the most (3) children: Each child gets a colspan of 2 - which totals to 6.
Row with next most (2) children that need to split: Each child gets a colspan of 3 - which totals to 6.
Row with single children: Each child (the one) gets a colspan of 6 - which totals to 6.
I really don't see how complex tables can be bi-directional just by looking at divs alone... which is a bit troubling.
DA's table parsing isn't accurate for medium complexity tables...
Example: https://da.live/edit#/da-sites/bacom/fragments/why-adobe/contact-footer/lets-talk-about Solution: https://codepen.io/auniverseaway/pen/OJGzbVB
Not sure how we can infer these more complex layouts with only divs. Here's my stab at this:
Row with the most (3) children: Each child gets a colspan of 2 - which totals to 6. Row with next most (2) children that need to split: Each child gets a colspan of 3 - which totals to 6. Row with single children: Each child (the one) gets a colspan of 6 - which totals to 6.
I really don't see how complex tables can be bi-directional just by looking at divs alone... which is a bit troubling.