Which type of sites (live or not, aem_edge or all) should be enabled for broken-backlinks?

adobe / spacecat-audit-worker

SpaceCat Audit Worker for auditing edge delivery sites.

Apache License 2.0

2 stars 2 forks source link

Which type of sites (live or not, aem_edge or all) should be enabled for broken-backlinks? #210

Open iuliag opened 5 months ago

iuliag commented 5 months ago

Overview

Which type of sites (live or not, aem_edge or all) should be enabled for broken-backlinks and more generally for SEO assessments?

Details

https://cq-dev.slack.com/archives/C05A45JBP9N/p1712563602198179

https://github.com/adobe/spacecat-audit-worker/blob/main/src/backlinks/handler.js#L55-L69 https://github.com/adobe/spacecat-api-service/blob/main/src/controllers/trigger/backlinks.js#L32

Proposed Actions

and now?

iuliag commented 5 months ago

@solaris007 , @meryllblanchet , could you give your perspective for the question from the business/product pov, and from the technical pov if any limitation?

solaris007 commented 5 months ago

@iuliag i don't see any limitations from a technical PoV. the broken backlinks audit does not put our architecture under strain and fits well with the established audit / reporting pattern. the only concern i have is COGS. as such types of sites should be limited to be commensurate with the AHREFS API limit.