Closed xavierfacq closed 5 months ago
Question: Do we use /available/operating-systems or /available/operating_systems?
I realise this has already been merged with operating-systems
, but given we use underscore everywhere else (feature_version
, heap_size
, release_type
, c_lib
, image_type
, etc. etc) I'm genuinely surprised why this is committed with a departure from the convention?
"Operating systems" is two words in English, so should be operating_systems
in the API. Can we change before too late?
Question: Do we use /available/operating-systems or /available/operating_systems?
I realise this has already been merged with
operating-systems
, but given we use underscore everywhere else (feature_version
,heap_size
,release_type
,c_lib
,image_type
, etc. etc) I'm genuinely surprised why this is committed with a departure from the convention?"Operating systems" is two words in English, so should be
operating_systems
in the API. Can we change before too late?
I agree with you, I'll push a new PR with that modification
Question: Do we use /available/operating-systems or /available/operating_systems?
I realise this has already been merged with
operating-systems
, but given we use underscore everywhere else (feature_version
,heap_size
,release_type
,c_lib
,image_type
, etc. etc) I'm genuinely surprised why this is committed with a departure from the convention?"Operating systems" is two words in English, so should be
operating_systems
in the API. Can we change before too late?
Here is the PR for the change : https://github.com/adoptium/api.adoptium.net/pull/1020
Changes have been done on paths:
Question: Do we use /available/operating-systems or /available/operating_systems?
Question 2: Do you know how to hide an endpoint in this swagger version?Checklist
mvn clean install
build and test completes