search

adoy / PHP-FastCGI-Client

Lightweight, single file, FastCGI client for PHP
MIT License
302 stars 61 forks source link

non-blocking implementation #12

Open langemeijer opened 9 years ago

langemeijer commented 9 years ago

The current implementation is using a blocking socket stream implementation.

Would you accept a non-blocking implementation in your project? Do you have any criteria that I should meet for my contribution to be accepted?

gordalina commented 9 years ago

This project is not actively maintained, would be great for @adoy to let someone else maintain it so it can grow further. If you plan on forking it, let me know, i may contribute.

langemeijer commented 9 years ago

I think I'm a casual tourist passing by and will be improving the code as I pass along. I have no interest in maintaining it. I will have a working project within one or two weeks, and will probably never look at the fastcgi client code again unless something breaks down.

I'm building something like a scheduled job server. Until now we have a few servers that run jobs as cli scripts, but to take advantage of opcode caching we are changing to fpm.

I have a master process that commandeers fpm servers when jobs are ran. This master process will use a non-blocking version of the PHP-FastCGI-Client spawning a lot of requests per server over one client connection.

The non-blocking socket implementation is required to fit into the architecture of the already existing code for the master process.

If my goals match adoys' I can do the coding, prepare nice pull requests and do the discussions on why I choose to do stuff. I will do the coding anyway, and it will be in my github account.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Samuel Gordalina notifications@github.com wrote:

This project is not actively maintained, would be great for @adoy to let someone else maintain it so it can grow further.

If you plan on forking it, let me know, i may contribute.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/adoy/PHP-FastCGI-Client/issues/12#issuecomment-155903901