Closed euri10 closed 1 year ago
What do you think of this: asyncpg-trek creates its own schema to handle migrations
One huge issue: you're not always allowed to create your own schemas on certain hosted Postgres offerings. I think it should be an option but not the default.
oh I didn't know that, how people can live without ? but yeah so optional makes more sense in that case you're right.
PR welcome 😄
Currently the public schema is the default for creating the migrations table, there doesnt seem to be a way to create it elsewhere.
I'd be tempted to say it is a bad idea because:
What do you think of this: asyncpg-trek creates its own schema to handle migrations, and uses a migrations table inside it, low chances of conflicts, and you are able to run migrations on others schema, asyncpg-trek always knows where to find its migrations table