Closed cool-RR closed 4 years ago
Thanks, I believe it's a new addition to the language. Will check if it works well on test cases in all supported versions of python.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 12:46 Coveralls notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: Coverage Status] https://coveralls.io/builds/31508079
Coverage remained the same at 89.557% when pulling d5e68a4 https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/commit/d5e68a44a7fb4ca0dbaffc057c1e214b6764284a on cool-RR:patch-2 into aa47500 https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/commit/aa475004bc22fe8f477227974fceb28537ddff67 on adriank:master.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/pull/100#issuecomment-645299433, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABLE4V3NXESOWIROJSAKQTRXCNH3ANCNFSM4OAPEFPQ .
-- Greetings, Adrian Kalbarczyk
It's not new, it's supported since Python 2.6. You're welcome :)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:54 PM Adrian Kalbarczyk notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks, I believe it's a new addition to the language. Will check if it works well on test cases in all supported versions of python.
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 12:46 Coveralls notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: Coverage Status] https://coveralls.io/builds/31508079
Coverage remained the same at 89.557% when pulling *d5e68a4 < https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/commit/d5e68a44a7fb4ca0dbaffc057c1e214b6764284a
on cool-RR:patch-2 into aa47500 < https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/commit/aa475004bc22fe8f477227974fceb28537ddff67
on adriank:master*.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/pull/100#issuecomment-645299433, or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABLE4V3NXESOWIROJSAKQTRXCNH3ANCNFSM4OAPEFPQ
.
-- Greetings, Adrian Kalbarczyk
https://kalbarczyk.co | https://devyard.io
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/pull/100#issuecomment-645328327, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAN3SVYV2GL3DCIKLB2DCDRXCVG5ANCNFSM4OAPEFPQ .
@adriank Any conclusions? Anything on Python 2.6 or above would very likely work the same.
Didn't have time yet.
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 16:35 Ram Rachum notifications@github.com wrote:
@adriank https://github.com/adriank Any conclusions? Anything on Python 2.6 or above would very likely work the same.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adriank/ObjectPath/pull/100#issuecomment-647136408, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABLE4TVTADFI5ZMAVT4IODRXYLD7ANCNFSM4OAPEFPQ .
-- Greetings, Adrian Kalbarczyk
This is a faster and more idiomatic way of using
itertools.chain
. Instead of computing all the items in the iterable and storing them in memory, they are computed one-by-one and never stored as a huge list. This can save on both runtime and memory space.