Open aaccomazzi opened 4 years ago
We want the facets to be grouped under AGUFM. Right now instead we have:
AGUFM
AGUFM.A51 AGUFM.H51 AGUFM.A55 ...
@csgrant00 what about APS? Right now I see APS...MAR, APS..DMD, etc. Should they all be mapped to APS or keep as they are?
APS...MAR
APS..DMD
APS
We want the facets to be grouped under
AGUFM. Right now instead we have:@csgrant00 what about APS? Right now I see
APS...MAR,APS..DMD, etc. Should they all be mapped toAPSor keep as they are?