Closed romanchyla closed 6 years ago
The new data also has CDS, here is the list of all data sub types
data = [ 'ARI', 'SIMBAD', 'NED', 'CDS', 'Vizier', 'GCPD', 'Author', 'PDG', 'MAST', 'HEASARC', 'INES', 'IBVS', 'Astroverse', 'ESA', 'NExScI', 'PDS', 'AcA', 'ISO', 'ESO', 'CXO', 'NOAO', 'XMM', 'Spitzer', 'PASA', 'ATNF', 'KOA', 'Herschel', 'GTC', 'BICEP2', 'ALMA', 'CADC', 'Zenodo', 'TNS', '' ]
golnaz
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Roman Chyla notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #60 https://github.com/adsabs/AdsDataSqlSync/issues/60 to @golnazads https://github.com/golnazads.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adsabs/AdsDataSqlSync/issues/60#event-1300163721, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AbbOCBeiSZFqIrUE5v-YQ5b-tyHdoW6Qks5stpUHgaJpZM4P-iJq .
i'm not sure where that data comes from @golnazads - Steve ran nonbib pipeline yesterday and there were no changes in the code in the meantime; so the record in question - should it have SIMBAD?
Yes, it think so. that is what I also get in my local db that I created while back. I think it should be SIMBAD.
data_pipeline=# select * from nonbib.datalinks where bibcode='2015ApJ...815L...1T';
bibcode | link_type | link_sub_type |
url | title | item_count
---------------------+-----------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------+------------------------+------------
2015ApJ...815L...1T | ARTICLE | EPRINT_HTML | { http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04460} | {} | 0
2015ApJ...815L...1T | ARTICLE | EPRINT_PDF | { http://arxiv.org/pdf/1511.04460} | {} | 0
2015ApJ...815L...1T | ARTICLE | PUB_HTML | { http://dx.doi.org/10.1088%2F2041-8205%2F815%2F1%2FL1} | {} | 0
2015ApJ...815L...1T | ARTICLE | PUB_PDF | { http://stacks.iop.org/2041-8205/815/L1/pdf} | {} | 0
2015ApJ...815L...1T | DATA | SIMBAD | {http://$SIMBAD$/ simbo.pl?bibcode=2015ApJ...815L...1T} | {"SIMBAD Objects (1)"} | 1
(5 rows)
you think the last record used to be CDS in nonbib?
just checked solr for links_data and here is what is there
"links_data":["{\"title\":\"\", \"type\":\"simbad\", \"instances\":\"1\", \"access\":\"\"}", "{\"title\":\"\", \"type\":\"pdf\", \"instances\":\"\", \"access\":\"open\"}", "{\"title\":\"\", \"type\":\"preprint\", \"instances\":\"\", \"access\":\"open\"}", "{\"title\":\"\", \"type\":\"electr\", \"instances\":\"\", \"access\":\"open\"}"],
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Roman Chyla notifications@github.com wrote:
i'm not sure where that data comes from @golnazads https://github.com/golnazads - Steve ran nonbib pipeline yesterday and there were no changes in the code in the meantime; so the record in question - should it have SIMBAD?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adsabs/AdsDataSqlSync/issues/60#issuecomment-337768026, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AbbOCJ7pFamE5Qz7MKZUMLf3LLEFTb0Fks5stpy6gaJpZM4P-iJq .
I checked the source file, SIMBAD is correct. We made changes in the way we structure links over the past month so now we consistently create the same labels for the "data" solr field and the datalinks table. So some changes in "data" are to be expected.
for 'data' field, old solr index has 'CDS', the new has 'SIMBAD'
this is what i see in the nonbib table; @golnazads or @aaccomazzi can you tell if it is ok, or we might be missing something?