advait45 / incredimail-converter-reynardware

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/incredimail-converter-reynardware
0 stars 0 forks source link

Attachments which names contain non ASCII characters are not included properly #7

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a mail with an attchment as name "félix.pdf"
2. Convert
3. Import converted mail in MUA

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
The attachment is invalid

What version of the product are you using?
0.3

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by mrec...@gmail.com on 5 Oct 2009 at 9:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I consider this an low priority limitation.  I am currently working on this 
problem,
but as I have stated on my main site, I am considering canceling this project 
due to
personal and other reasons. 

Original comment by ReynardW...@gmail.com on 6 Oct 2009 at 1:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Well it depends on your language ! If it is English then it may be true, but if 
not
it is really a big issue. Thanks for your help.

Original comment by mrec...@gmail.com on 6 Oct 2009 at 1:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Ok, I agree...if your language is not English then it is a big deal.  I am 
looking
into this issue and so far I would have to basically rewrite my converter to 
support
Unicode.  To me it would be nice to have all languages but right now I will 
fully
accept this as an application limitation.  Maybe if I get Incredimail 2 figured 
out I
will support Unicode. 

Original comment by ReynardW...@gmail.com on 8 Oct 2009 at 8:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hello,
I may not necessarily be a Unicode problem. For instance if I prepare a mail 
with
"félix.pdf" attachment, the Content-Type is:
Content-Type: application/pdf;
 name="=?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=E9lix=2Epdf?="
Therefore the problem may be in header field handling ?
Thanks

Original comment by mrec...@gmail.com on 9 Oct 2009 at 1:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by ReynardW...@gmail.com on 21 May 2010 at 11:32