I noticed that the Wagner graph, despite being the same graph, has a different "feeling" than the Möbius strip perspective. The first picture gives a sense of Satisfaction, while the second picture gives a sense of Restlessness.
The Wagner graph is a minimum discrete embedding of the Möbius topology. It is a filled Avatar Graph, which algorithm was extended from Cartesian stair-pair combinatorics, precisely to allow Möbius topologies.
In Joker Calculus (dual in Closed variant):
(0 ?0, 1 0) = ?(0 ?0) restlessness in 0
(1 0, 0 ?0) = ?(1 0) satisfaction in 0
!?(1 0) = ?(0 ?0) in Open & Closed variant
!?(0 ?0) = ?(1 ??0) in Open variant, ?(1 0) in Closed variant
Could Satisfaction and Restlessness be expressible in Joker Calculus? Are they dual language biases?
This idea came up during a reading group about Jean-Luc Nancy's commentary on Hegel (first chapter): https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Nancy_Jean_Luc_Hegel_The_Restlessness_of_the_Negative_2002.pdf
I noticed that the Wagner graph, despite being the same graph, has a different "feeling" than the Möbius strip perspective. The first picture gives a sense of Satisfaction, while the second picture gives a sense of Restlessness.
The Wagner graph is a minimum discrete embedding of the Möbius topology. It is a filled Avatar Graph, which algorithm was extended from Cartesian stair-pair combinatorics, precisely to allow Möbius topologies.
In Joker Calculus (dual in Closed variant):
(0 ?0, 1 0) = ?(0 ?0)restlessness in0(1 0, 0 ?0) = ?(1 0)satisfaction in0!?(1 0) = ?(0 ?0)in Open & Closed variant!?(0 ?0) = ?(1 ??0)in Open variant,?(1 0)in Closed variant