Acrostic titles (qa tag) still not right - title text now placed after </title>

[DavidHaslam]

The latest "fix" didn't work out right.

<!-- d --><title type="psalm" canonical="true">
<verse sID="Ps.9.1" osisID="Ps.9.1" n="1" />Кіроўцу хору. Пасьля сьмерці Лабэна. Псальма Давідава.</title>
<title type="acrostic"></title>
Алэф
<verse eID="Ps.9.1" />
<lg>
<l level="1">
<verse sID="Ps.9.2" osisID="Ps.9.2" n="2" />Славіць буду <transChange type="added">Цябе </transChange> , Госпадзе, усім сэрцам маім, абвяшчаць пра ўсе цуды Твае, <verse eID="Ps.9.2" /></l>
<l level="1">
<verse sID="Ps.9.3" osisID="Ps.9.3" n="3" />я буду радавацца, весяліцца, імя Тваё апяваць, Усявышні.</l>
</lg>
<title type="acrostic"></title>
Бэт
<verse eID="Ps.9.3" />

NB. I had since updated my SFM file to make proper use of poetry tags. 19-psalm.txt.usfm.zip

[DavidHaslam]

Aside: Of course, the fact that the XML passes Syntax Check and the OSIS validates might have too readily convinced you that the issue #85 had been fully fixed.

"Necessary but not sufficient" still applies.

[adyeths]

The latest fix worked fine. And then you changed the text. I'm not sure exactly what's going on here now but it's something different from what I just fixed in #85.

[DavidHaslam]

As I was the one that converted the work to USFM back in 2011 with minor improvements in 2014, I still take an interest in it.

The SWORD module is also one with orphaned verse tags.

I thought there’d be a good prospect to improve the module by using u2o.py.

The changes made this afternoon make sense in that using poetry tags is more appropriate than just having one \p before each \v 1 of each Psalm.

Also to use \d before \v 1 is valid USFM when some or all of the Psalm descriptive titles are versified.

But yes - it’s a different issue.

[adyeths]

This is now fixed.

[DavidHaslam]

Thanks!