and so on. Construct new numbers looks trivial (and when you see repesentation of eg. number 4 it is easy to count pattern). In new way, the plus + "means" only adding numbers (cast is implicite - exept 0 and 1 where we use it to cast directly). Also edit number by hand (increasing or decreasing) is easy.
In my opinion this way of write numbers is more easy and redable than old way (which is based on true => !+[])
for person who see old representation first time, it is not trivial task to construct number 3,4,... - also when you look on number 4 it is hard to count pattern and recognize it. Here + character has "not easy" meaning. Edit that number by hand (increasing/decreasing) is no easy
Hi I found following alternative representation for number 1 based on
true => !0 => +[]1 =>+!![]2 => !![]+!![]3 => !![]+!![]+!![]4 => !![]+!![]+!![]+!![]and so on. Construct new numbers looks trivial (and when you see repesentation of eg. number 4 it is easy to count pattern). In new way, the plus
+"means" only adding numbers (cast is implicite - exept 0 and 1 where we use it to cast directly). Also edit number by hand (increasing or decreasing) is easy.In my opinion this way of write numbers is more easy and redable than old way (which is based on
true => !+[])0 => +[]1 =>+!+[]2 => !+[]+!+[]3 => !+[]+!+[]+!+[]4 => !+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]for person who see old representation first time, it is not trivial task to construct number 3,4,... - also when you look on number 4 it is hard to count pattern and recognize it. Here
+character has "not easy" meaning. Edit that number by hand (increasing/decreasing) is no easy