Closed paolobueno closed 6 years ago
@paolobueno Reviewed. Good job. We can update that once we will settle on what initial storage solution will be used.
@paolobueno great work!
@david-martin @wtrocki @pb82 I asked a couple of questions inline. I was reading the great proposal @paolobueno wrote and wanted to clear some stuff before updating the document with the new architecture.
@david-martin @pb82 @wtrocki Note that client side of things will not be included in this proposal. Client side seems in a separate epic:
cc @david-martin @wtrocki @pb82 @darahayes @StevenTobin Updated the proposal. Didn't want to go into too much detail in complex technical things as they're captured in spike JIRAs.
@aliok I think we're close to merging. I've left a couple of comments if you could review
@david-martin I think we're in a state that we can share the proposal with the wider group. Doing it now.
Closing this one. Gonna create a new proposal for architecture#1 here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1894
Description
Gathering information from the related spikes and docs.
Branch created in upstream repository instead of own repository to allow for contributions from others.
Tasks