search

aerospike / aerospike-server.docker

Dockerfiles for Aerospike Server
Other
141 stars 68 forks source link

cli client not included in container #4

Closed dnelson closed 6 years ago

dnelson commented 9 years ago

I was trying to write basic functionality tests for https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/586 but was unable to access the database via the docker container because the tools that are mentioned in the documentation does not appear to be included in the Docker container.

Can the cli client be added to the container?

volmarl commented 9 years ago

We had deliberately removed the tools from the container to create a lighter container. We were planning to create a seperate container for tools. Would a seperate container for tools help you with your test case? Or would you need to have it on the same container?

cstivers78 commented 9 years ago

We will release a aerospike-tools container, which you can use to run one of our many tools.

dnelson commented 9 years ago

I don't think any of the existing Docker official-image tests require a secondary container, but maybe @tianon can shed light on whether that is an acceptable way to run the tests.

fattenap commented 9 years ago

+1 aerospike-tools container :+1:

tianon commented 9 years ago

Here's one that currently uses separate containers to run the MySQL daemon and the MySQL client: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/ac172614c20881939886780512eb12ecbf352850/test/tests/mysql-basics/run.sh

What I suspect you meant was a separate image, for which the following is a good example: (it builds a second image specifically to get the "cgi-fcgi" client binary) https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/ac172614c20881939886780512eb12ecbf352850/test/tests/php-fpm-hello-web/run.sh

tclass commented 9 years ago

yepp, aerospike-tools container would be great, any update on this?

volmarl commented 9 years ago

We're trying to have it deployed this week.

On Jun 24, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Tobi notifications@github.com wrote:

yepp, aerospike-tools container would be great, any update on this?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-server.docker/issues/4#issuecomment-114938611.

volmarl commented 9 years ago

Aerospike Tools container is now deployed: https://github.com/aerospike/aerospike-tools.docker

tclass commented 9 years ago

@volmarl: wow that was fast, thx :)

P.S. I think you can close the issue now