Open aerostitch opened 11 years ago
Hi, thanks for submitting this issue :)
From what I can say, I think it's possible, of course. We have the traffic light elements and I guess we can somehow extend the routing graph, to take the number of lights/crossings that had to be passed into account.
From my perspective, this is slightly related to #1047 (and maybe a dupe?) and a first step towards #570. Anybody else from the team opinions on that?
As we are currently try to find our way back to a stable version, I will park it for only for the next major release.
1047 looks very similar.
However, #570 I would consider to be a different issue: Here we are talking about traffic lights, which are part of the static map. If we simply add a penalty for each traffic light passed, that penalty (and thus the travel time, as well as the choice of route) would never change, unless the map itself is changed (e.g. the user downloads a later version in which traffic lights have changed). In contrast to that, #570 is about considering the current traffic situations (mostly traffic jams—though delays waitign at traffic lights could also be represented). Traffic changes over time, to the point that calculating the same route twice at different times could yield different results as the traffic situation may change.
Technically, the challenge here is to add a cost to a point (currently only segments have a cost in Navit). For #570, the challenge is to obtain traffic data, translate them into map segments and keep that information up to date.
Issue migrated from trac ticket # 1162
component: core | priority: minor | keywords: eta traffic speed
2013-08-19 13:06:43: geer@pfaffenhofen.de created the issue