Closed EVGrokker closed 7 years ago
Right now the mi or km is depicted by what's in settings.
Often its referred as local travel. Would Local Travel (mi) be acceptable?
I'm not opposed to 'Local Travel', but the value that the user supplies here is subsequently referred to as 'reserve energy'. I was trying to keep them connected. Your call.
But reserve energy would have to be by kWh or at least SoC. I was trying to make it simpler for them to account for the energy by entering what they really want to buffer, distance.
We just need to be uniform and clear. I also agree about the abbreviation thing.
OK, I'm good with 'Local Travel (mi/km)'. I'll explain further in the help.
v 1.2.0 (28)
The label for the Destination Reserve field needs to be updated to be location-agnostic.
Two options:
What would you think about changing this label to 'Reserve Energy (xxx)'? I don't like seeing the abbreviation for Destination.