Closed hvr closed 11 years ago
So @gregorycollins suggests that an instance be submitted upstream to @meiersi ... I gather that Builder is moving to bytestring, so is this a patch against blaze-builder or bytestring?
AfC
Probably both. We're not quite ready to move to bytestring-builder across the board yet, which is why io-streams is still using blaze-builder.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Cowie notifications@github.comwrote:
So @gregorycollins https://github.com/gregorycollins suggests that an instance be submitted upstream to @meiersi https://github.com/meiersi... I gather that Builder is moving to bytestring, so is this a patch against blaze-builder or bytestring?
AfC
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/afcowie/http-streams/issues/24#issuecomment-16993454 .
Gregory Collins greg@gregorycollins.net
Since Haskell does not allow to control the import/export of typeclass instances, or as is written in the Haskell Wiki:
And here's evidence to show, that
http-streams
leaks theIsString Builder
instance, as soon asNetwork.Http.Types
is imported (indirectly):