Closed davidyuk closed 3 years ago
this issue seems to be a reiteration of things that have been discussed extensively during the finalization of the AEX incl. the method names.
I think it is important to have them resolved explicitly and publicly. To be able to check how these decisions were made. Do you have links to discussions on these topics? Or we can start discussing them essentially.
I can't find any discussions in https://forum.aeternity.com/t/aex-5-inter-wallet-communication/3371
no longer relevant, AEX-2 and AEX-5 are both withdrawn. I am wondering if we should propose a new standard for wallet connections. seems like this has generally been a big pain in the past
https://github.com/aeternity/AEXs/blob/9e7a9360d8fb942ff32a4492deb2e289b51e3aff/AEXS/aex-5.md#proposed-process-with-inter-wallet-communication
[ ] Why don't make names of these methods same? (excluding difference in wallet/aepp)
[ ] AEX-5 mostly duplicates the functionality of AEX-2 I think we should unify them into AEX-2. So, if we want to connect two wallets, the master wallet should communicate with slave wallet as with aepp.