search

aeternity / AEXs

Aeternity expansions repository — application layer standards
10 stars 25 forks source link

AEX-4: Why it defines two scheme names? #78

Closed davidyuk closed 3 years ago

davidyuk commented 5 years ago

From what I found, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar are using a single name for URI schemas, why do we need two names (ae and aeternity)? From my point of view, it makes development more complicated, each wallet should support both of them.

What if some aeternity: call failed, should aepp in that case try ae: scheme? What if the environment (like registerProtocolHandler) is asking confirmation for adding schema handler and the user agreed for the first one but declined the second? The single scheme will help to avoid such confusing situations.

shekhar-shubhendu commented 5 years ago

it is still a draft. the discussion is open on which one(or both) to use. the final version will have a single scheme.

davidyuk commented 5 years ago

I have been asked to review it. I'm also thinking that it is not very efficient to review draft AEXs.

I think that we should use aeternity:.

marc0olo commented 3 years ago

no longer relevant, AEX-4 is withdrawn