Currently, if e.g. one function call parameter is missed out, one is greeted with a rather generic error:
Could we add a check to the constructors of the types returning a proper error if empty data is passed? Or, any other ideas for a less confusing error ?
Currently, if e.g. one function call parameter is missed out, one is greeted with a rather generic error:
Could we add a check to the constructors of the types returning a proper error if empty data is passed? Or, any other ideas for a less confusing error ?