Closed SebastianVomMeer closed 11 years ago
Hi @SebastianG86,
At present, it is undefined behavior. ROS's original use-case was to make it easier to access configuration hashes, so its specs don't cover preservation of changes to sub-elements. I'll take a look into it and see if I can easily handle your use-case.
Fixed in commit e1729734c7290009c980e2076e0965feb694c39d and released in recursive-open-struct v0.4.2.
Great work, thank you so much!
I'm not sure if this is a bug or a misunderstanding of mine: I cannot change the properties of a nested RecursiveOpenStruct:
Why is o.b.c still 1? Is this the expected behaviour?
recursive-open-struct (0.3.1)