Closed t6s closed 12 months ago
I also noticed a few lemmas marked in bayes.v to be moved to ssr_ext.v, and did it.
This is fine with me. Have you considered other notations of less than 3 characters? Maybe !_
could have worked. It looks like array addressing to me, which seems appropriate here. (This could even be proposed at the MathComp level.)
This is fine with me. Have you considered other notations of less than 3 characters? Maybe
!_
could have worked. It looks like array addressing to me, which seems appropriate here. (This could even be proposed at the MathComp level.)
Haskell is using !
for array subscripting by the way.
This is fine with me. Have you considered other notations of less than 3 characters? Maybe
!_
could have worked. It looks like array addressing to me, which seems appropriate here. (This could even be proposed at the MathComp level.)
No, and I have no particular preference. Which do you really like?
in the circumstances, !_
looks appropriate
looks pretty enough
The notation
\_
fortnth
defined in ssr_ext.v (at level 9) conflicts with the one in classical_sets (at level 10), blocking uses of mathcomp-analysis at some places, particularly when trying to reboot PR #67 .This PR replaces it by
\__
(one extra underscore) to avoid the conflict.