Open chrisewolf opened 7 years ago
Hi Chris, Is you lattice constant 11.1 atomic units or Angstrom? The direct lattice vectors in the INPCAR file should be in Angstrom.
What also seems suspect is that your first k-point in the EIGENVAL is (1/4,1/4,1/4) instead of (1/2,1/2,1/2). Regards, Karol
Hi Karol!
Thank you for your swift reply! The lattice constant is 11.1 bohr (EMC has length units in bohr if I am not mistaken). The INCAR file shows the corresponding unit cell in Angstrom:
Converted Quantum ESPRESSO output to OUTCAR format suitable for aMoBT
volume of cell : 206.43
direct lattice vectors reciprocal lattice vectors
0.000000000 0.000000000 5.909999261 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.169204759
5.909999261 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.169204759 0.000000000 0.000000000
0.000000000 5.909999261 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.169204759 0.000000000
and you are right, there is an interesting discrepancy between the pwscf out and EIGENVAL In terms of the (19) k-points:
nscf:
number of k points= 19
cart. coord. in units 2pi/alat
k( 1) = ( 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 2) = ( 0.4966410 0.5000000 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 3) = ( 0.5033590 0.5000000 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 4) = ( 0.5000000 0.4966410 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 5) = ( 0.5000000 0.5033590 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 6) = ( 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.4966410), wk = 0.0526316
k( 7) = ( 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.5033590), wk = 0.0526316
k( 8) = ( 0.4966410 0.4966410 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 9) = ( 0.5033590 0.5033590 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 10) = ( 0.5033590 0.4966410 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 11) = ( 0.4966410 0.5033590 0.5000000), wk = 0.0526316
k( 12) = ( 0.4966410 0.5000000 0.4966410), wk = 0.0526316
k( 13) = ( 0.5033590 0.5000000 0.5033590), wk = 0.0526316
k( 14) = ( 0.5033590 0.5000000 0.4966410), wk = 0.0526316
k( 15) = ( 0.4966410 0.5000000 0.5033590), wk = 0.0526316
k( 16) = ( 0.5000000 0.4966410 0.4966410), wk = 0.0526316
k( 17) = ( 0.5000000 0.5033590 0.5033590), wk = 0.0526316
k( 18) = ( 0.5000000 0.5033590 0.4966410), wk = 0.0526316
k( 19) = ( 0.5000000 0.4966410 0.5033590), wk = 0.0526316
EIGENVAL:
2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.4830000E-01 2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5170000E-01 2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5170000E-01 2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.4830000E-01 2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5170000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.4830000E-01 2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 2.4830000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 2.5170000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.5170000E-01 2.4830000E-01 1.0000000E+00
2.5000000E-01 2.4830000E-01 2.5170000E-01 1.0000000E+00
I thought this might be a difference in convention (as the factor is exactly 2). Unfortunately I am not familiar with VASP to know if this breaks the emc.py (as the k-distances would be wrong, most likely)?
Thank you for your time and assistance!
Best, Chris
Hi Chris, The units in emc.py are mixed, the step size is in 1/Bohr but the lattice vectors are in Angstrom. So your input file for emc.py should be:
0.500 0.500 0.500 0.001 43 V 5.9099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9099 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9099
Regards, Karol
@chrisewolf Can you please tell me how to fit the band manually to calculate the effective mass? What unit conversion do I need to implement?
@https://github.com/chrisewolf, I tried to use the QE-to-Vasp.py to convert the nscf.out file to EIGENVAL and OUTCAR but it keep complaining. It gives me this error:
File "QE-to-VASP.py", line 102, in
Dear all!
I know that the interface for QE is not currently available but I am trying to circumvent the issue by using a script to generate the EIGENVAL from the nscf output on the stencil grid [1].
this worked well for a system where I had the band-gap opening at k=0 (gamma) but I fail to get the appropriate masses at any other point (I am assuming at this stage I am doing something wrong).
Assuming a cubic unit cell (a=11.1.. a.u) and the band-gap being at R(0.5/0.5/0.5) of the BZ, would the following input/output be appropriate?
I believe this is correct because the k-points give me lots of points approaching R(0.5/0.5/0.5), e.g.
the EIGENVAL file then reads
Holes (band 44):
Electrons:
Effective mass (0): 0.023
when I fit the band-structure manually I get around m*~0.08...0.1
can someone spot my mistake? Any help is greatly appreciated, I am quite lost where to start looking... all files can be found here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4jAwkTrBEE8UENUNS02RjUyT00
Thank you for reading until here!
Best, Chris
[1] https://nanohub.org/resources/23040/download/QE-to-VASP.py