Closed aforren1 closed 5 years ago
Not actually with Returns
. The issue was related to dealing with concatenation in cases where dimensions didn't necessarily match (because 1 dim was dropped). The fix in 0683bd7c9d63a02a5f7c2e3db0fbdd07893a5d42 should handle that case, but perhaps I shouldn't be dropping dims in the first place. It makes accessing the most recent data for devices running between 60 - 120 Hz (in this case, meaning we expect between 1-2 samples a read) awkward, because the indexing is different.
Specifically, with
Returns
.