In the Word export, the Profile Definition table (the message definition) the Cardinality comes first followed by Usage
But in the Segment Definition table, the Usage comes before the Cardinality
Readers have said it would be easier to scan the tables, if the columns were in the same order in the different table types. I don't have a strong feeling on the order, but Usage and then Cardinality would be my suggestion.
It looks like in IGAMT itself, the columns are always Usage and then Cardinality.
In the Word export, the Profile Definition table (the message definition) the Cardinality comes first followed by Usage![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17408249/46096757-a6ea8a80-c185-11e8-80a7-7f2f4316e271.png)
But in the Segment Definition table, the Usage comes before the Cardinality![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17408249/46096794-bd90e180-c185-11e8-8388-caedab164dff.png)
Readers have said it would be easier to scan the tables, if the columns were in the same order in the different table types. I don't have a strong feeling on the order, but Usage and then Cardinality would be my suggestion.
It looks like in IGAMT itself, the columns are always Usage and then Cardinality.