Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It also doesn't register https:// resources as being remote.
Original comment by mgarrish
on 6 Feb 2013 at 3:34
It also throws an error that '?' is an invalid OPF file name, but the character
name restrictions in OCF s. 2.4 are only for resources within the container,
aren't they?
Wouldn't web-hosted resources fall outside of this requirement, or should the
spec be loosened?
Original comment by mgarrish
on 6 Feb 2013 at 4:46
switch 'file name' with 'file name character'
Original comment by mgarrish
on 6 Feb 2013 at 4:47
Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2013 at 12:37
Original comment by markus.g...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2013 at 12:38
The issue is quite tricky, as there is no way to know how 3d-party plugins are
using `param` elements to refer to resources.
One way to mitigate the issue is to add a special case for
"application/x-shockwave-flash" objects.
But otherwise, it seems to me that checking the validity (i.e. legitimacy) of
the "remote-resources" property is somehow impossible. WDYT ?
Original comment by rdeltour@gmail.com
on 27 Mar 2013 at 1:55
I'll create dedicated issues for the "https" and file name character issues.
Original comment by rdeltour@gmail.com
on 27 Mar 2013 at 1:56
Proposed resolution: report a WARNING that no remote resource reference has
been found.
Original comment by rdeltour@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2013 at 2:55
This issue was closed by revision r456.
Original comment by rdeltour@gmail.com
on 29 Mar 2013 at 2:57
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mgarrish
on 6 Feb 2013 at 3:23