search

agathazeren / cuneiforbits

𒆩𒀩𒂷𒂷𒂷𒀖
1 stars 1 forks source link

Better name for `ComponentClass` #11

Open agathazeren opened 4 years ago

agathazeren commented 4 years ago

This seems like a bad name, but I can't think of a better one.

yvnat commented 4 years ago

Maybe RocketComponentType, if you want to be verbose. ComponentClass works just fine, and its only downside is that it's pretty generic without context.

agathazeren commented 4 years ago

The main issue I have with it is that it does not seem to mean that the data specific to that component class are part of it, and seems like a simple enum that is only the actual class.

yvnat commented 4 years ago

How about ComponentDetails or ComponentData?

agathazeren commented 4 years ago

I like ComponentData.

agathazeren commented 4 years ago

SpecificComponent? Specifics? Just annother idea.