Closed jamesmckinna closed 11 months ago
I'm sure that this sort of issue will recur, but closing this now (and should have, after #2089).
@jamesmckinna when you close issues because a PR has addressed them, can you check that there's the correct Milestone
added and the PR is linked against in the Development
box (both on the RHS). Makes it a little easier to sort and filter historical issues when doing archaeology!
Certainly! Sorry to have missed your comment until now.
Two quick thoughts, plus a placeholder:
variable
s !suc-injective
can be made lazier by redefining it ascong pred
, and systematically replacing uses of that compound elsewhere?NB this is intended to be cosmetic for v2.0, not the systematic overhaul envisaged by @JacquesCarette in #1925
Note to self: could be folded into any PR addressing #2087