Closed felixwellen closed 1 year ago
I have not found and not heard of anything against this way of dealing with it, so I'll implement it.
The solution was that the authors of the corresponding parts of the 1lab agreed to relicense under some BSD license. The license exception is noted now.
We already have or will soon have files which are essentially copied from the 1lab. Since the 1lab uses the AGPL 3 licence and we use an MIT licence, we should note the exceptions in our licence file. Maybe like this: "There are a couple of files, which are licenced under more restrictive licences. Those files are marked with the corresponding SPDX identifier." I do not know if this is how it should be done, if you know, please speak up. See the discussion here: #988.