Closed kangrongji closed 11 months ago
Not a user of sequential colimits (yet), but this looks like an improvement to me.
What do you think about the name Lim→
?
I consistently forger the traditional math notation it resembles over the years, but maybe that's just me. It is also a lot shorter than SeqColim
.
Yeah... I think Lim→
looks a bit weird. There is no hurt to use SeqColim
instead. I could do all these changes.
When using sequential colimits from the library, the constructor
inl
can be hard to align withpush
during pattern patching, etc. So it doesn't look good. Renaming it toincl
and maybe changing the field namespace
toobj
would improve alignment and give a more category-theory-inspired feel. If you all agree, I could make a PR very soon.