Closed ecavallo closed 1 year ago
Maybe we could use something like _$r_
for ring morphisms?
Yeah, I think there's already a _$a_
for algebras or something like that. For the graph homomorphisms it might be best to change it to match the Algebra conventions for homs.
I think I defined _$a_
but ended up not using it. But now that I think of it, I'm actually for using it and similar functions.
It doesn't have anything to do with reflection (don't know why I put it there in the first place) and is generally useful.
The obstacle is that different functions called
_$_
are defined elsewhere in the library, namely in Algebra.Ring.Base and Data.Graph.Base. We'd have to rename these.