Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Vim version: 7.3.429
Same thing also occurs when "[[URL|desc]]" is replaced with "desc" when the
cursor is not on the line. Makes lines with multiple links basically unreadable.
Original comment by alexandr...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2013 at 1:29
It may be a bit hard for someone to follow your description, but I believe that
what you are seeing is simply a result of Vim's implementation of its "conceal"
feature. In particular, it has nothing to do with resizing of windows, and
there is nothing that vimwiki could do to make the behaviour of concealed text
more intuitive (aside from choosing not to use the feature).
That said, I agree that the perceived problem is quite disturbing at first, and
some may never get accustomed to it. I am actually rather surprised that you
are the first one to complain about it, I had expected a flood of complaints -
this link concealing feature has been in the codebase perhaps for two years
already.
What Vim does: it conceals text on each _screen line_ separately - this is
presumably to avoid large-scale redrawing and shifting of text lines anytime
you move cursor up and down the file. This way, only the text of the logical
cursor line changes as you move the cursor, nothing else needs to be moved up
or down. But for long concealed text, such as long URLs in Vimwiki, this means
that the concealed form of a link might get strangely torn across lines,
sometimes even separated by several empty lines.
It is this concealing behaviour which makes it difficult to do anything about
concealing in tables - there is basically no way one could have both concealed
form and at the same time visually aligned columns. Just as with links, it
could work nicely only if unconcealed text fits on a single screen line, but
not in general.
That said, this link concealing should be made optional in Vimwiki, even if one
wants to keep using the simple concealing of one-character markers.
Original comment by tpospi...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2013 at 2:33
Hi ! Thanks for the quick reaction, and yes, this is exactly what I am seeing.
I agree that the issue description was a bit cryptic, so for anyone reading
this thread, here's what I am referring to:
-- what I write --
[[http://localhost/this-is-a-long-url|URL1]]
[[http://localhost/this-is-another-long-URL|URL2]] this
is trailing text
-- what I see when I move my cursor to another line --
URL1 URL2 this
is trailing text
What you say about concealing and display/redrawing optimization makes perfect
sense. After checking the vimwiki help, I ended up adding these lines in my
.vimrc:
set conceallevel=0
let g:vimwiki_conceallevel = 0
But now it is no longer conceling anything, even [[WikiLink]] links -- the
square brackets remain and this hampers readability. I have been using vimwiki
1.2 for years and just recently decided to try 2.0, and frankly this is a step
backwards in terms of usability -- I don't think shortening long blocks of text
adds more value than it takes away, as opposed to hiding backtics and other
one-character markers as in 1.2.
Your suggestion (option to keep simple concealing only) makes perfect sense.
Thanks for the work on vimwiki in any case -- one of the best and most
efficient productivity tools around !
Original comment by alexandr...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2013 at 3:39
It is now possible to turn off link shortening, although it is still on by
default.
https://code.google.com/p/vimwiki/source/detail?r=5db3125c4e3d6ddd27f3df62b511b4
5db8d7a3bd
One has to use
let g:vimwiki_url_maxsave = 0
in .vimrc
It is done both for the plain URLs and links with description, since I suppose
that people who are bothered by one would also mind the other.
I had already put a remark on possible ugliness of concealed text in the
documentation for that option some time ago, but now it is better explained
what the problem is.
But the link markers (square brackets etc) will not be hidden if you turn it
off: that would be possible to implement in principle, but it would require
more additions to the code that is already dangerously obese, and who knows how
much testing with all kinds of links, whose number I lost track of a long time
ago.
The change I have pushed increased only the size of the documentation. One-char
markers are still hidden, those are much less likely to cause any serious
disturbance.
Original comment by tpospi...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2013 at 8:44
Seems to work nicely; I can probably live with the [[ ]] markers. Many thanks !
Original comment by alexandr...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2013 at 8:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alexandr...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2013 at 4:49