Closed ptopa closed 8 years ago
I noticed one more thing. Menu has to sections: a) structure analyzer and b) morphology. They present the same information.
I attach my idea of menu structure: menu-propozycja.pdf. What do you think?
@ptopa I have some suggestions and questions for clarification:
Reset parameters
?Evolve
and Regress
. Should they be completely removed from visualizations's toolbar?Morphology
section becomes Morphometrics
?Browser
section and clicks Visualize
button without selecting record from the table, they ends with blank simulation scene. User is able to set genotype and then perform simulation - user generates model from scratch instead of refreshing already existing object. I suggest label Generate model
over Refresh model
?Number of chambers
go? Currently it has been moved to Genotype
section.@bzurkowski : ad 1: Redraw model with parameters exactly as it was in record from DB. In other words any modifications introduced by user in Genotype section are cancelled. ad 2: Remove ad 3: Yes ad 4: I agree.
ad 1: I think it is good idea to have "No of chambers" in Genotype section.
@ptopa New version of visualization's toolbar has been deployed in production environment (http://mongo.icsr.agh.edu.pl/). Please verify the results.
In my opinion menu on right side of visualisation screen is unclear and difficult to use. The main problem is in lack of distinction between various UI components. Buttons that refresh model (in my opinion should be emphasized) are lost between other components. I think we need something what provide information how to use these components, i.e. graphical signs...