Closed agibralter closed 13 years ago
@freelancing-god -- any thoughts?
ts-resque-delta
(and equivalents) are abbreviations, I feel, hence why I used the full path. Now, I'm not so fussed - for example, with Thinking Sphinx I added lib/thinking-sphinx.rb
, so you don't need to specify a :require option. I see no issue with doing something similar here.
Yeah, I'm going to change it and update the README. I think it's more elegant to just have people specify the gem and get the most desired behavior. Plus with Rails 3 now, we can automatically load Rake tasks.
Yeah, about time with the Rake task stuff - Merb had that from early on.
On 08/09/2011, at 11:42 AM, Aaron Gibralter wrote:
Yeah, I'm going to change it and update the README. I think it's more elegant to just have people specify the gem and get the most desired behavior. Plus with Rails 3 now, we can automatically load Rake tasks.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/agibralter/ts-resque-delta/issues/7#issuecomment-2035799
Is there any good reason why this has been a convention in TS-related gems:
as opposed to: