Open hugocorbucci opened 10 years ago
ceci
commented
10 years ago Not sure which of these would actually be interesting, but...
mhaddad
commented
10 years ago 
hugocorbucci
commented
10 years ago @ceci: Not sure how I'd make an infographic of highlights. Maybe just basic info on the session name and authors in a 'bubble'?
About the first (accepted) session submitted. How about a graph of number of accepted submissions over time? Something that could given a sense of when people started to submit proposals and when the ones that got approved were submitted. Showing the huge spike of proposal submissions at the end of the deadline. And probably not as many approvals in that spike.
@mhaddad: After our chat, my understanding is that we would use the information reviewers input for each review describing the knowledge level they judge the authors have on their proposal and how reviewers feel about their own review. Those are 'beginner/practitioner/experienced' possible answers. So we would need to find a way to plot, out of the approved sessions, how many of each combination there are. So I could easily answer how many approved sessions from experienced authors and reviewed by experienced reviewers I have and how many are from practitioner authors but beginner reviewers. Sounds reasonable? I'm also having a hard time thinking about how to handle the fact that each proposal has 3 reviews and those may not agree with each other.
ceci
commented
10 years ago @hugocorbucci Bubbles would be great! And I love the idea of the submissions vs. approvals timeline -- I feel hopeful that it will help next year.
In order to amaze the conference attendees As a conference or program chair I want to have an infographic available about the submissions and approved proposals
Interesting general data around where submissions came from, how many approved/rejected, where are the reviewers from, gender, etc. Any comments around what interesting data could go into the infographics would be great!