search

agilescientific / modelr-app

Modelr front end
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 1 forks source link

Match fluid intervals to rock intervals #150

Closed kwinkunks closed 9 years ago

kwinkunks commented 9 years ago

This might be hard.

It would be good to show a filtered version of the intervals that only includes the intervals where the rocks have a fluid defined. I think perhaps one should not be able to add intervals to the fluid sub column, except in those intervals where fluid is defined. (So clicking to add a zone outside a fluid sub zone should have no effect).

I don't think you should be able to move the top or base of the fluid-sub zone — it should match the top and base of the rock zone it pertains to. Likewise, moving the top or base of the rock zone should also move the corresponding fluid zone.

This might be the hardest part to achieve: We should probably allow adding a zone (a movable one) inside a fluid-sub zone, to account for wanting to add the HC-water interface in the middle of a sand, say.

So I guess I'm proposing 3 types of 'top'/'pick' in the fluid column:

  1. Not really a type... but rock-column tops that define non-fluid-subbable zones should not show up, or should be greyed out.
  2. The top and base of fluid-subbable zones should be shown and tied to the rock column. So they should not be selectable or deletable in the fluid column.
  3. Intra-fluid-subbable tops should be allowed, and movable and deletable.

See also #143

ben-bougher commented 9 years ago

Given this, #149 and #143 it sounds like the initial plan of having the fluid and rock models independent is a no go.

Exposing dynamic rock properties that include the fluid sub parameters might help clean up the interface. When you click on a rock interval, a menu comes up where you can set vp,vs,rho, initial fluid, and a sub fluid (#149)?

kwinkunks commented 9 years ago

Hm, I guess they're quasi-independent. I mean, we can't do fluid sub where we don't have the data for the rock. So the fluid model only applies where we do... I guess there's no real harm in showing it, as if it applied elsewhere.

Perhaps they can be independent, but we sort of mask the fluid model with a semi-transparent cover where it doesn't apply. Like:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/eo969z4hnsji0w6/Screenshot%202015-01-28%2009.18.18.png

I guess if there are only brine, oil, and gas fluids (and eventually user fluids), and no 'clay', and if we only sub rocks that have fluid data, that would be a good first step...

ben-bougher commented 9 years ago

I think this behavior is working