Open AlexRamageScot1 opened 2 years ago
By Compliance with Inspire
do you mean compliance with current Inspire metadata technical guidance, or compliance with the Implementing regulation?
As far as the regulation[1] goes metadata element’ means a discrete unit of metadata, in accordance with EN ISO 19115
. No version is specified, so using latest version should[2] still be compliant with the regulation. For example [3] has:
For the types CI_Citation and MD_Resolution used in definitions of attributes and association roles of spatial object types or data types, the definitions given in EN ISO 19115 shall apply
[1] COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1205/2008 of 3 December 2008 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata
[2] Would need to check that the regulation doesn't mention types from ISO 19115:2003 that are removed/deprecated from ISO 19115-1...
[3] COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services
James with the TG.
Alexander Ramage
From: James Passmore @.> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 1:09:30 PM To: agiorguk/gemini @.> Cc: AlexRamageScot1 @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [agiorguk/gemini] Upgrading to ISO 19115:2016? (Issue #71)
By Compliance with Inspire do you mean compliance with current Inspire metadata technical guidance, or compliance with the Implementing regulation?
As far as the regulation[1] goes metadata element’ means a discrete unit of metadata, in accordance with EN ISO 19115. No version is specified, so using latest version would still be compliant with the regulation.
[1] COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1205/2008 of 3 December 2008 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/agiorguk/gemini/issues/71#issuecomment-1103857533, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKJTQZCMA3I3U3YI4ZBTEFLVF7XXVANCNFSM5T3X7JKA. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Schemas can be found at: https://schemas.isotc211.org/19115/
In December 2017, Ted Haberman (the project lead of ISO 19115-3 first edition) did a mapping of ISO 19115-1:2014 elements that covers this CSW 'queryables & returnables'. It was going to be presented to OGC MetaCat DWG, but their records are very incomplete. I'm going to be cheeky and attach a late draft of it here (converted to PDF). ISO19115-1_2014_mappings_to_CSW_queryables_and_returnables.pdf
I'm sure I supplemented it to cover the other GEMINI elements beyond the CSW ones & shared that with Michael Lutz to give an idea of the (low) complexity of upgrading to the more recent ISO 19115 edition(s) - but my records are also incomplete!
That first edition ISO 19115-3 included an XSLT to map from ISO 19139: https://github.com/ISO-TC211/XML/tree/master/standards.iso.org/iso/19115/resources/transforms/ISO19139
There have been suggestions that keeping UK Gemini on the old ISO 19115 standard should be reviewed.
Pro's
Cons
Welcome thoughts.