Open winni2k opened 7 years ago
Also, if I run fastx_quality_stats
with the -N
flag enabled, then I get the following output:
cycle max_count ALL_count ALL_min ALL_max ALL_sum ALL_mean ALL_Q1 ALL_med ALL_Q3 ALL_IQR ALL_lW ALL_rW A_count A_min A_max A_sum A_mean A_Q1 A_med A_Q3 A_IQR A_lW A_rW C_count C_min C_max C_sum C_mean C_Q1 C_med C_Q3 C_IQR C_lW C_rW G_count G_min G_max G_sum G_mean G_Q1 G_med G_Q3 G_IQR G_lW G_rW T_count T_min T_max T_sum T_mean T_Q1 T_med T_Q3 T_IQR T_lW T_rW N_count N_min N_max N_sum N_mean N_Q1 N_med N_Q3 N_IQR N_lW N_rW
1 2 2 60 60 120 60.00 60 50 50 -10 75 35 2 60 60 120 60.00 60 -45 -45 -105 217 -202 0 100 -100 0 nan 100 100 100 0 100
-100 0 100 -100 0 nan 100 100 100 0 100 -100 0 100 -100 0 nan 100 100 100 0 100 -100 0 100 -100 0 nan 100 100 100 0 100 -100
The median and quartile values still appear to be off.
Hi, when I run the command
, where
input.fastq
consists of, then
output.stats
consists of. Note the
med
column has a value of 50, whereas themean
column has a value of 60, and the two quality scores ininput.fastq
are identical (]
).I believe this is a bug?
PS
fastx_quality_stats -h
prints: